13.09.1988 in WP.Nos.4217 and 4218 of 2009. Both the writ petitions were allowed by this Court by order dated 11.12.2009 thereby directed respondents 1 and 2 to appoint them as Helper within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The respondents / Board filed appeal and the same was also dismissed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in WA.Nos.1596 and 1597 of 2010 by order dated 16.11.2009. Even then, respondents 1 and 2 failed to appoint the petitioners and as such, they were constrained to file a contempt petition. While pending the contempt petition, the respondents issued board proceedings in BP.No.15 dated 03.09.2011 stating that "Accordingly, 169 persons shall be provisionally be appointed to the post of Helper(Trainee) in Regular Work Establishment category on temporary basis to the Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation for a period of two years under Regulation 106 of Tamilnadu Electricity Board Service Regulation and for a consolidated wages of Rs.3,250/- per month. It was recorded and contempt petition was closed. However, the petitioners were given liberty to challenge the two years training period.
