Disposed

A.Susairaj v. The District Collector

Madras HC7 Jun 2023WP/16738/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus against municipal authorities and police to action a tyre shop run by respondents facing complaints of pollution and lack of license. Court noted notice issued pending action and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

No order petition disposed of taking note of submission that notice issued and action would be taken under Sec. 114-A.

A.Susairaj Vs The District Collector — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Writ Petition No.16738 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Writ Petition No.16738 of 2023

¶7

A.Susairaj S/o.Arokiyasami

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶12

3.The Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality/Corporation, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore - 607 001.

¶13

4.The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore Port Police Station, Cuddalore - 607 003.

¶14

5.Dhiraviyam

¶15

6.D.Rani

¶16

W/o.Dhiraviyam ... Respondents

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Writ Petition No.16738 of 2023

¶20

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take immediate action against respondents 5 and 6 and see that no business in tyres is done in any portion of Door No.8, I Cross Street and also in any portion of I Cross Street, Sapthagiri Nagar, Pachayankuppam, Cuddalore - 607 003 by considering the representation dated 18.01.2023 sent by the petitioner to respondents 1 to 3.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader [R1, R2 & R4] Mr.L.P.Maurya Standing Counsel [R3] *****

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus

¶24

directing the respondent Corporation to take action on the representation made by the petitioner on 18.01.2023 and to stop the respondents 5 and 6 from continuing to run the wheel vulcanizing shop, which according to the petitioner is causing pollution and the residence in and around the locality are facing hardship.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Writ Petition No.16738 of 2023

¶28

When the matter was taken up for admission, learned Standing

¶29

Counsel appearing on behalf of third respondent submitted that already a notice has been issued to the petitioner and the sixth respondent seeking to remove the encroachment that has been put up by them. That apart, the representation made by the petitioner has been taken into consideration and in the event of respondents 5 and 6 running the business without obtaining license, appropriate action will be initiated u/s.114-A of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

¶30

Recording the submission made by learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶31

07.06.2023

¶32

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No gm

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Writ Petition No.16738 of 2023

¶36

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J

¶37

¶38

¶39

1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶40

2.The Tahsildar, Cuddalore, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶41

3.The Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality/Corporation, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore - 607 001.

¶42

4.The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore Port Police Station, Cuddalore - 607 003.

¶43

Writ Petition No. 16738 of 2023

¶44

07.06.2023

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/4

A.Susairaj v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Susairaj v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.K.Rajan Vs The Union of India

L and W Building solutions Private Limtied Vs Micro and small Enterprises Facilitation Council

P.Vageesan Vs The Commissioner

R.Jeyaraj Vs The State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.

V.Murali Vs The Chief Executive officer

V.Murali Vs The Chief Executive officer