Dismissed

M/s.G.v.Audio Vision Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer

Madras HC8 Mar 2023WP/1625/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petitioner sought to quash a tax order and compel acceptance of a claim. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, granting liberty to approach the appellate authority. Case closed as a non-decisive administrative order on withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. Directed the appellate authority to accept an appeal within two weeks without reference to limitation, to be disposed of expeditiously.

M/s.G.v.Audio Vision Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Tax… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.1625 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 08.03.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P.No.1625 of 2021 and WMP No.1838 of 2021

¶7

M/s.G.V.Audio Vision Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director K.K.M.Kathir No.120/1-2(Opp.) D & C Apartments, Sampath Nagar, Erode – 638 011

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The State Tax Officer, Mettur Road Assessment Circle, Erode.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TIN 33363043996/2013-14 and quash the order dated 1.12.2020 passed therein and further direct the respondent to accept the claim of the petitioner in total.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Raveendran

¶14

For Respondent : Ms.Amrita Dinakaran Government Advocate

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶17

W.P.No.1625 of 2021

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority by way of statutory appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶20

In light of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above. Appeal, if any, filed within a period of two (2) weeks from today, shall be taken on file by the appellate authority without reference to limitation, but ensuring compliance with other statutory conditions, if any, and disposed expeditiously and in accorance with law. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

08.03.2023

¶22

Index : Yes / No Speaking/non-speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No sl Note: Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶23

¶24

The State Tax Officer, Mettur Road Assessment Circle, Erode.

¶25

W.P.No.1625 of 2021 and WMP No.1838 of 2021

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.G.v.Audio Vision Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.G.v.Audio Vision Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Johy Electricity India Engineering Private Ltd. Vs The Appellate Authority

M/s. Pushkar Properties Private Limited, Vs The State Tax Officer

N.a.Irudhayaraj Vs The Commissioner

M/s.Grandhe Construction Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Smt. Neetaa Suneel Shah Vs The Income Tax Officer

Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Cgst and Central