Dismissed

R.Vasu v. The Executive officer/Tender Inviting Authority

Madras HC14 Jul 2023WP/16090/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed two writ petitions and closed connected miscellaneous petitions. The Court observed that the petitioner had withdrawn the tenders and the Earnest Money Deposit was returned, rendering the petitions unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs; connected writ miscellaneous petitions were closed.

R.Vasu Vs The Executive officer/Tender Inviting… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 19, 21 & 22 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.07.2023

¶4

CORAM: JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

¶5

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 15519, 15521 & 15522 of 2023

¶6

R.Vasu

¶7

... Petitioner in both WPs

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Executive Officer/Tender Inviting Authority Pethanaickenpalayam Town Panchayat Salem District

¶10

... Respondents in both WPs

¶11

Prayer in W.P. No.16090 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to his impugned e-mail communication dated 13.04.2023 in respect of Tender ID No.2023_DTP_294072_1 and in Tender Reference No.142/2022/A1 in relation to petitioner's bid submitted in Bid ID No.670478 and quash the same with consequential direction, directing the respondent to evaluate the technical bid submitted by the petitioner afresh insofar as the tender floated by the respondent for providing of BT Road with drain and culvert in Pethanaickenpalayam Town Panchayat, Salem District under Kalaignar Nagarpura Membattu Thittam (KNMT) 2022-2023.

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 19, 21 & 22 of 2023

¶15

Prayer in W.P. No.16096 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to his impugned e-mail communication dated 13.04.2023 in respect of Tender ID No.2023_DTP_294075_1 and in Tender Reference No.70/2022/A1 in relation to petitioner's bid submitted in Bid ID No.670476 and quash the same with consequential direction, directing the respondent to evaluate the technical bid submitted by the petitioner afresh insofar as the tender floated by the respondent for strengthening of BT Road with drain and culvert in Pethanaickenpalayam Town Panchayat, Salem District under NABARD XXVIII 2022-2023.

¶16

For Petitioner in both : Mr.S.Senthil WPs For Respondents in both : Mr.M.Bindran, AGP WPs

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The petitioner has filed these petitions for a writ of certiorarified mandamus visa-vis the petitioner's bid. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing

¶19

for the respondent makes a statement that since the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner offered to withdraw his tenders and the EMD was also returned to him.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶21

_________ Page 2 of 4_

¶22

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 19, 21 & 22 of 2023

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner also concur with the statement made by the learned Additional Government Pleader. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in these writ petitions. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶24

14.07.2023

¶25

Asr Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order

¶26

¶27

1.The Executive Officer/Tender Inviting Authority Pethanaickenpalayam Town Panchayat Salem District

¶28

2.The Government Pleader, High Court, Madras

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶30

_________ Page 3 of 4_

¶31

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 19, 21 & 22 of 2023

¶32

N.SESHASAYEE, J.,

¶33

Asr

¶34

W.P. Nos.16090 & 16096 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.15518, 15519, 15521 & 15522 of 2023

¶35

14.07.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶37

_________ Page 4 of 4_

R.Vasu v. The Executive officer/Tender Inviting Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Vasu v. The Executive officer/Tender Inviting Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Annaii Medical College and Hospital Vs The Registrar

S.Murugan Vs the Director

Tamizhaga Cable Tv Operators Vs Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable Tv Corproation Limited

Mathuvanthi Vs The Regional Passport officer

R.Sarada Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Mj.Sankar Vs the Commissioner