Disposed

Mahendra Singh v. The Senior Intelligence Officer

Madras HC20 Oct 2023WP/16025/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a refund of Rs. 6,99,000/- under Article 226. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2021 in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 19.04.2021 in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity

Mahendra Singh Vs The Senior Intelligence Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.16025 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.10.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.No.16025 of 2021

¶7

Mr.Mahendra Singh Proprietor of M/s.Mahasakthi Infotech, 17/19, 1st Floor, Nakoda Plaza, Narsinghapuram Street, Chennai - 2.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI (CZU), No.16, 5th and 8th Floor, Tower II, BSNL Building, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 090. ... Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to refund to the Petitioner a sum of Rs.6,99,000/-.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Reddy For Respondent : Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil Senior Panel Counsel

¶13

1/3

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.16025 of 2021

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The Writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct 1^st respondent to refund the petitioner a sum of Rs.6,99,000/- was recovered without jurisdiction.

¶18

At the outset it was submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent they shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 19.04.2021 seeking refund of Rs.6,99,000/- after providing an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law which was agreed to by the learned counsel of the petitioner.

¶19

In view thereof the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent to dispose of the representation dated 19.04.2021 in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

¶20

20.10.2023

¶21

(1/2)

¶22

Index: Yes/No Speaking order/ Non speaking order Neutral Citation :Yes/No spp/shk

¶23

2/3

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.16025 of 2021

¶26

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.

¶27

spp/shk

¶28

¶29

The Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI (CZU), No.16, 5th and 8th Floor, Tower II, BSNL Building, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 090.

¶30

W.P.No.16025 of 2021 (1/2)

¶31

20.10.2023

¶32

3/3

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mahendra Singh v. The Senior Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Singh v. The Senior Intelligence Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Beroe Consulting India Private Limited Vs Additional / Joint / Deputy/ Assistant

M/s.Star Royal Distributors Vs State Tax Officer

Veena Bajaj Vs Deputy Commissioner of income tax

M/s.Mms Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs The State tax Officer

Mahendra Singh Vs The Senior Intelligence Officer

Tvl.Alliance Projects Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)