Allowed
S.Vadivel v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Madras HCWP/15660/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction to remove derogatory news videos about him published by media outlets following a settled matrimonial dispute.
What did the court decide?
Directing respondents 1 to 3 to remove the videos in the online social media within two weeks.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 17.05.2023
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
¶6
W.P.No.15660 of 2023
¶7
S.Vadivel
¶8
...Petitioner
¶9
vs.
¶10
- The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Erode City, Erode.
¶11
- The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Erode Town Station, Erode.
¶12
- The Inspector of Police, Erode North Police Station, Erode – 638 011.
¶13
- Galatta Media Private Limited, No.177, Raheja Towers, 7th Floor, Sigma wing, Anna Salai, Chennai – 02.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
S. Vadivel
- respondent
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Erode City
- respondent
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Erode Town Station
- respondent
Inspector of Police, Erode North Police Station
- respondent
Galatta Media Private Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court