Dismissed

S.Subashini, v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC18 Aug 2023WP/15421/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking inclusion in the tentative list for Graduate Assistant Teachers. The petition was disposed of without consideration as recruitment rules were changed, requiring the petitioner to clear the Teacher Eligibility Test.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent directing inclusion in the tentative list was not granted; the petition was dismissed.

S.Subashini, Vs the Secretary to Government — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18.08.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

¶7

S.Subashini ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.The Secretary to the Government, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 002 2.The Director, Teacher Recruitment Board, E.V.K.Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai 600 006 3.The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi 4.National Council for Educational Research & Training, New Delhi 5.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Public Services Commission, Chennai 600 006 6.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006 7.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai 600 006 ... Respondents

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

1/4

¶11

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to enlist or include the petitioner in the Tentative list of candidates, provisionally selected for the appointment of Direct Recruitment of Graduate Assistants Teachers through Employment Registration State Seniority 2010-2011.

¶13

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶14

For Respondents For R1,6 & 7 : Dr.T.Seenivasan, Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.C.Kathiravan, Standing Counsel For R5 : Mr.R.Baranidaran, Standing Counsel for TNPSC

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition has been filed for direction to t he second

¶17

respondent to enlist or include the petitioner in the Tentative list of candidates, provisionally selected for the appointment of Direct Recruitment of Graduate Assistants Teachers through Employment Registration State Seniority 2010-2011.

¶18

2/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

¶21

On perusal of records, though the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to include her name in the tentative list of candidates, provisionally selected for the appointment of Direct Recruitment of Graduate Assistants Teachers through Employment Registration State Seniority 2010-2011, the prayer sought for in this writ petition cannot be considered, since the recruitment process for the post of Graduate Assistant Teachers has now been changed and the petitioner has necessarily to pass the Teacher Eligibility Test.

¶22

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be

¶23

no order as to costs.

¶24

Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶25

18.08.2023

¶26

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶27

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

lok

1.The Secretary to the Government, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 002 2.The Director, Teacher Recruitment Board, E.V.K.Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai 600 006 3.The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi 4.National Council for Educational Research & Training, New Delhi

¶32

5.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Public Services Commission, Chennai 600 006 6.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006 7.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai 600 006 8.The Government Advoate, High Court, Madras.

¶33

W.P.No.15421 of 2011

¶34

18.08.2023

¶35

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Subashini, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Subashini, v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chennai Metropolitan Vs the Chennai Metro Politan

V.Radhigha Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

B.S.Sujatha Vs the Chairman

E.Poongundran, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

R.Muthukumaraswamy Vs the Managing Director

R.Duraimohan, Vs the Registrar of Coop.