T.Singaravelu v. the Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition because the sole petitioner had died and his legal heirs had not impleaded themselves to continue the proceedings.
The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition because the sole petitioner had died and his legal heirs had not impleaded themselves to continue the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.15360 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.6 and 7 of 2013
T.Singaravelu
... Petitioner
Vs
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
(R9 impleaded as per order dated 18.07.2013 in M.P.No.5 of 2013 in
W.P.No.15360 of 2013) ... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Madamus, call for the records and quash the proceedings of the third respondent in his (Per) (CMD) TANGEDCO Proceeding No.119 dated 29.11.2012 Karthigai, 14, Sri Nanda Aandu, Thiruvalluvar Aandu 2043 and the proceedings of the fourth respondent in
Page 2 of 5
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
A.Sa.Ku.En.112706/2801/G55/G551/2012-1 dated 02.01.2013 and consequently direct the respondents to place the petitioner in the seniority list based on 3% reservation for handicapped with effect from 26.02.1988.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondents R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Rajkumar, Standing Counsel R5 : Mr.L.Chandrakumar R6 to R8 : Mr.R.Krishnasamy R9 : Mr.R.Sunil Kumar
O RDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner died. Even then, the legal heirs of the petitioner did not take any steps to implead themselves as parties to proceed with this petition.
abated. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
26.07.2023
Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn
Page 3 of 5
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
To
Page 4 of 5
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,
mn
W.P.No.15360 of 2013
26.07.2023
Page 5 of 5
T.Singaravelu
The Principal Secretary, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation
The Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation
The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation
Placement Officer/Personnel, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation
Tamil Nadu Electricity Engineers Forum
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court