Writ petition under Article 226 challenging specific Rules of the 2017 Choice based Credit System Regulation filed by public interest. Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in person. Connected appeals also dismissed.
No order passed as the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
K.M.Karthik
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining Regulation 2017 Choice based Credit System common to all B.E./B.Tech Full Time Programmes (For the students admitted to B.E./B.Tech Programme at various affiliated Institutes) passed by the
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
second respondent and declare the Rules 6.1, 14.2, 14.3 and 14.5 of the above said Regulation 2017, Affiliated Institutions Choice Based Credit System, Common to all B.E./B.Tech. Full-Time Programmes (For the students admitted to B.E./B.Tech. Programme at various Affiliated Institutions) as unconstitutional, null and void.
For the Petitioner : No appearance
No appearance for Respondent-2
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
In the writ petition, notice was issued on 19.01.2019. The Court specifically refused to pass interim order.
Rules 6.1, 14.2, 14.3 and 14.5 of the Regulation, 2017.
dismissed for non-prosecution. There will be no order as to costs.
_________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.1686 and 1687 of 2019 are also dismissed.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 17.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
kpl
To
_________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
(kpl)
W.P.No.1522 of 2019
17.10.2023
_________ Page 4 of 4_
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition deserves admissibility when the petitioner has failed to appear after notice.
Whether to grant relief declaring specific Rules of a University Regulation unconstitutional.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K.M.Karthik
State of Tamil Nadu
The Vice Chancellor Anna University Guindy
Sanjay V.Gangapurwala
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
