have initiated legal proceedings including arrears of salary by filing petitions under Section 33(c) of the Act, in accordance with 12(3) agreement. Aggrieved by the same, the Management charged 11 false allegations against the petitioners and appointed an enquiry officer. The enquiry officer conducted enquiry and submitted a report as if, the charges have been proved against the petitioners in all the petitions. Based on the enquiry report, the management have terminated the petitioners on 30.04.2004. Hence, the petitioners have raised an Industrial Dispute before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour-II, Chennai against the order of termination. After conducting enquiry, the second respondent passed an award in ID Nos.84, 85 & 86 of 2008 dated 17.11.2014 stating that the order of termination is set aside but misconceived the fact about criminal case and denied the order of reinstatement and directed the first respondent to pay the compensation to the petitioners. The second respondent has denied the order of reinstatement and awarded eager compensation to the petitioners. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioners have filed these writ petitions.
