Allowed

M/s.Kk Granite Marketing v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Madras HC20 Jun 2023WP/12992/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras set aside assessment orders of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act passed under principles of natural justice. It directed fresh notice and a personal hearing within eight weeks, allowing the writ petitions without cost.

What did the court decide?

Impugned assessment orders set aside; notice issued afresh; personal hearing to be conducted within eight weeks.

M/s.Kk Granite Marketing Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.Nos.12922 of 2023 etc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.06.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P.Nos.12992,12994 & 12996 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.12790 to 12792 of 2023

¶7

M/s.KK Granite Marketing Rep. by its Authorized Signatory 109/110 Ramalingam Road West, R.S.Puram Coimbatore- 641 002. (Present Address 735/2, 1st Floor, Goldwins,Avinashi Road, Civil Aerodrome Post, Coimbatore 641 014)

¶8

.. Petitioner in all writ petitions

¶9

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), RS Puram Assessment Circle, Coimbatore - 641 018.

¶11

.. Respondent in all writ petitions

¶12

Prayer : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order of re-assessment in TN 33251943252 / 201112, 2012 – 13, 2013 - 14 dated 18.07.2022 received by the petitioner herein through registered only on 02.03.2023 from the files of the respondent herein and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Ms.Aparna Nandakumar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.Nos.12922 of 2023 etc

¶18

COMMON ORDER

¶19

Read this order in conjunction with and in continuation of

¶20

order dated 26.04.2022. That reads as follows:-

¶21

“Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent and seeks some time to obtain instructions and file a counter.

¶22

2. The challenge is to orders of assessment, all dated 18.07.2022, though received on 02.03.2023 and passed under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 for the periods 2011-12 to 2013-14 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

¶23

3. As can be seen from the reference in the impugned orders, the exchange of notices and replies have commenced effectively in 2019 and there has been no communication after the petitioner's letter dated 18.10.2019. The impugned orders have been passed in July, 2022, after a gap of nearly three years, without even affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

¶24

4. Interim stay, effective till the next date of hearing.

¶25

5. List on 20.06.2023 at the end of admission list. Counter by then with an advance copy served upon the petitioner.”

¶26

Today, on instructions from the assessing authority,

¶27

Mr.Prashanth Kiran, accedes to the factual position as set out in paragraph 3 of order, extracted above. Thus, there is no doubt in my mind that the impugned orders of assessment must be set aside in order to enable the proceedings to be conducted in line

¶28

with the principles of natural justice and in accordance with law.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/4

¶31

W.P.Nos.12922 of 2023 etc

¶32

Impugned orders of assessment dated 18.07.2022 are stated to have been served on the petitioner only on 02.03.2023 and hence these writ petitions instituted on 21.04.2023 are not hit by laches.

¶33

In light of the discussion as above, orders of assessment dated 18.07.2022 are set aside. Let notice be issued afresh and personal hearing be conducted within a period of eight weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order seeing as the periods in question relate to 2011 – 2012 and 2013 – 2014.

¶34

Writ petitions stand allowed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶35

20.06.2023

¶36

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm

¶37

To:

¶38

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), RS Puram Assessment Circle, Coimbatore - 641 018.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/4

¶41

W.P.Nos.12922 of 2023 etc

¶42

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶43

ssm

¶44

W.P.Nos.12992, 12994 & 12996 of 2023

¶45

20.06.2023

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/4

M/s.Kk Granite Marketing v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Kk Granite Marketing v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.a.S.C.Jawahar Ayya Vs The Tax Recovery Officer 5

Mr.Sunglow Lifescience P.Ltd Vs The State Tax Officer

M/S.Sibass Electric Private Ltd., Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)

Kamala Agencies Vs Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise

M/s.Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Mohanan Gnansekar Vs the State Tax Officer