S.Narayanasamy v. The Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court challenged recovery orders regarding excess pension payments. The court cited Supreme Court precedents on recovery timelines and stringent grounds. It held no further adjudication was required as recovery had already been made, closing the writ petition without explicit elaborate relief.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.1162 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
and
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
W.P. No.1162 of 2022 & W.M.P. No.1227 of 2022
S. Narayanasamy Petitioner v
- 1 The Registrar High Court of Madras High Court Chennai 600 104
- 2 The Director Treasuries & Accounts Department II Floor Combined Finance Department Office Complex Nandanam
Chennai 600 035
- 3 The Regional Director of Treasuries & Accounts Department II Floor Combined Finance Department Office Complex Nandanam
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether impugned recovery orders from the Pension Pay Officer vitiated for lack of specificity on grounds justifying recovery over a decade after payment.
Whether the High Court should interfere to set aside the recovery orders or quash the communication requiring return of excess pension.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Narayanasamy
- respondent
The Registrar, High Court of Madras
- respondent
The Director, Treasuries & Accounts Department
- respondent
The Regional Director of Treasuries & Accounts Department
- respondent
The Pension Pay Officer
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court