Disposed

K.Mohanraj v. State Rep by

Madras HC13 Apr 2023WP/11440/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent police authorities to consider the petitioner's representation requesting removal of his name from a police history sheet within four weeks and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and remove his name from the history sheet by removing them before considering on merits.

K.Mohanraj Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

K.Mohanraj

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶11

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, P.Velur Range, Namakkal District.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police, Paramathy Police Station, Namakkal District.

¶13

4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Jedarpalayam Police Station, Namakkal District. ...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1^st respondent police to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2023 and further direct the 3^rd respondent police to remove the petitioner's name from the History sheet record in H.S.No.176/2020 pending before the 3^rd respondent police.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anbuchezheiyan

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶20

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Petition prays for Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent

¶23

police to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2023 and further direct the 3^rd respondent police to remove the petitioner's name from the History sheet record in H.S.No.176/2020 pending before the 3^rd respondent police.

¶24

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the respondents would consider the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶25

3.In view of the same, there shall be a direction to the 1^st respondent

¶26

to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2023 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is for the respondents to

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

¶30

consider on merits the petitioner's request for removal of his name from the

¶31

history sheet.

¶32

4.This Writ Petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.

¶33

13.04.2023

¶34

kkn

¶35

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No

¶36

¶37

1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

¶38

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, P.Velur Range, Namakkal District.

¶39

3.The Inspector of Police, Paramathy Police Station, Namakkal District.

¶40

4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Jedarpalayam Police Station, Namakkal District.

¶41

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

KKN

W.P.No.11440 of 2023

¶48

13.04.2023

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

4/4

K.Mohanraj v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Mohanraj v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Imanulla Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramasamy Vs State Rep by

Selvam Kumar Vs Inspector of Police

M/s.Aroma Ayurvedik Spa center Vs The Superintendent of Police

Gurunathan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Ravanan Vs the Inspector of Police