M/s. Karthikeyan HUF v. The Inspector of Registration
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a refusal order regarding registration of a property document. The Court was informed that the grievances were redressed as the petitioner had paid the stamp duty and charges on 28.6.2023. Consequently, no further adjudication was required.
What did the court decide?
No further adjudication; the writ petition stands closed.
What the court decided
W.P.No.10927 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.10927 of 2023
M/s. Karthikeyan HUF
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.
2.The Sub Registrar, Office of registration Mylapore, Chennai.
3.The Authorised officer, Indian Bank, Stressed Assets Management Branch, No. 55, Ethiraj Salai, Chennai-8.
... Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requiring quashing of a refusal order requires adjudication once the petitioner has paid the dues.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Karthikeyan HUF
- respondent
1. The Inspector of Registration
- respondent
2. The Sub Registrar
- respondent
3. The Authorised officer, Indian Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court