Dismissed

Tvl.Janani Enterprises v. Joint Commissioner (St)

Madras HC12 Jun 2023WP/10613/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of GST orders. The court allowed liberty for the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within two weeks without reference to limitation.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach the appellate authority within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order, without reference to limitation.

Tvl.Janani Enterprises Vs Joint Commissioner (St) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 12.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021 and WMP 11225, 11226, 11228 & 11229 of 2021

¶7

Tvl. Janani Enterprises, Rep. By its Proprietor S.Sakthivel No.41/8, First Floor, Singarapillai Street, Mugappair Road, Mannurpet, Chennai - 600 050.

¶8

... Petitioner in both W.P.'s

¶9

¶10

1.Joint Commissioner (ST), Intelligence-II, Chennai - 600 006.

¶11

2.State Tax Officer, Group-1, Inspection-II, Intelligence-II,

¶12

No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006 ... Respondents in both W.P.'s PRAYER in W.P.No.10613 of 2021: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in order GST No:33CVSPS9250D1Z5/2018-19 dated 29.12.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same.

¶13

PRAYER in W.P.No.10614 of 2021: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in order GST No:33CVSPS9250D1Z5/2017-18 dated 29.12.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same.

¶14

In both W.P.'s https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Petitioner : Ms.Sri Vishvapriya

¶15

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.M.Venkateswaran Special Government Pleader

¶17

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶18

Ms.Sri Vishvapriya, learned counsel for the petitioner makes an

¶19

endorsement to the effect that the petitioner does not pursue these Writ petitions.

¶20

Thus, the impugned orders are confirmed and these Writ petitions are dismissed. However, liberty is sought to permit the petitioner to approach the appellate authority.

¶21

Mr.M.Venkateswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, fairly does not object to the liberty sought.

¶22

Hence, appeal, if filed within a period of two (2) weeks from date of receipt of copy this order, shall be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation, but ensuring compliance with other statutory conditions, if any.

¶23

These Writ Petitions are dismissed with liberty as above. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶24

12.06.2023

¶25

Index : Yes / No Speaking/non-speaking Order mpl

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021

¶28

¶29

1.Joint Commissioner (ST), Intelligence-II, Chennai - 600 006.

¶30

2.State Tax Officer, Group-1, Inspection-II, Intelligence-II, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021

¶33

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶34

mpl

¶35

W.P.Nos.10613 & 10614 of 2021 and WMP 11225, 11226, 11228 & 11229 of 2021

¶36

12.06.2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tvl.Janani Enterprises v. Joint Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl.Janani Enterprises v. Joint Commissioner (St)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of central Excise

Erode Cloth Merchants Vs The State of Tamilnadu

M/s.Aadhi Enterprises Private Ltd. Vs Office of the Tax Recovery officer

A.Jayabharathi Vs Mr.S.Ramdass and 3 others

M/s. Sri Krishna Timbers Vs State Tax Officer (collection and arrear)

Sri Muthukumaraswamy Devasthanam Vs K.a.Vasu