A writ petition seeking appointment as Village Librarian was dismissed as abated because the petitioner had died long ago and legal representatives failed to substitute themselves.
The writ petition was dismissed as abated with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
K.Bagyam ... Petitioner
Vs.
3.The District Library Officer, District Library Office, Coimbatore 641 001, Erode District ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the order in GO.Ms.No.66 Education, Science and Technology (K1) Department dated 30.01.1996, the order in GO.No.156 School Education (K2) Department dated 10.09.1998 and subsequent GO.(D).No.147, School Education (K1) Department dated 21.09.2011 passed by the first respondent and to quash the same as illegal, void, arbitrary and unreasonable in view of Adhoc Rules framed for the respondent establishment and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Village Librarian in Coimbatore District since the petitioner have been working in the District of Coimbatore as Part
1/4
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
Time Librarian from the year 1993 as Part Time Librarian.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arumugam
For Respondents : Dr.T.Seenivasan, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed to issue Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the order in GO.Ms.No.66 Education, Science and Technology (K1) Department dated 30.01.1996, the order in GO.No.156 School Education (K2) Department dated 10.09.1998 and subsequent GO.(D).No.147, School Education (K1) Department dated 21.09.2011 passed by the first respondent and to quash the same as illegal, void, arbitrary and unreasonable in view of Adhoc Rules framed for the respondent establishment and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Village Librarian in Coimbatore District since the petitioner have been working in the District of Coimbatore as Part Time Librarian from the year 1993 as Part Time Librarian.
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
petitioner died long back.
take any steps to substitute themselves in the place of the petitioner, which shows that they have no interest to pursue this writ petition.
22.08.2023
Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
lok
To
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
W.P.No.1055 of 2012
22.08.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be pursued after the death of the petitioner.
K.Bagyam
The State of Tamilnadu
The Director of Public Libraries
The District Library Officer
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
