Justice N. Sathish Kumar dismissed Writ Petition No.10544 of 2015 as infructuous because the Prayer's governing proceedings were no longer alive for adjudication at the time of hearing.
Dismissal of the Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.10544 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 20.1.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.No.10544 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
Vs.
... Respondents
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to place the proceedings under the Show Cause Notice dated 29.4.2014 for further enquiry before the 1st respondent in accordance to law and further direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the same within a stipulated period.
1/3
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi
O R D E R
W.P.No.10544 of 2015
Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the prayer as
sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication.
as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.1.2023
Speaking/Non Speaking order Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No
vaan To
1 The Chairman Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-600 001.
2/3
W.P.No.10544 of 2015
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vaan
W.P.No.10544 of 2015
Dated: 20.1.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition remains viable after the prayer became infructuous.
T.S.Mohamed Yusuf Jamal
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
The Superintendent of Wakfs
The Wakf Inspector, Thiruvannamalai
The Muthavalli
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
