Disposed

Ponnammal v. The Commissioner

Madras HC3 Apr 2023WP/10327/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a direction to demolish a dilapidated building unfit for habitation. The High Court directed the respondent to inspect the property and initiate appropriate legal action in accordance with the law.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to conduct an inspection of the building and initiate appropriate actions following legal procedures.

Ponnammal Vs The Commissioner — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.04.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶7

Mrs.Ponnammal wife of Arumugam, residing at No.206, Bharathi Street, Paappan Chavadi, Raawuthan Kuppam Post, Thiruchitrambalam, Villupuram District, represented by her power agent K.Lachiyaraj residing at No.6 Marriamman Koil Street Old Colony Sedarapattu, Puducherry – 605 111. ... Petitioner

¶8

The Commissioner Municipality of Puducherry Bussy Street Near Old Bus Stand Kamban Kalaiarangam, Puducherry – 605 001. ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, d irecting the respondent to exercise the power conferred under section 336 of the Puducherry Municipalities Act,

¶10

Page 1 of 5

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶13

1973 by acting the petitioner's representation dated 25.10.2022, after notice to all parties concerned and holding enquiry in accordance with law to demolish the old and dilapidated building measuring an extent of 2410 Sq.ft with 100 years old tiled house building thereon having built up area of 1200 sq.ft at Old Door No.9 and New Door No.37, Calvey Bungalow Street, Veerargava mudaliyar Thottam, Puthupalayam Revenue, bearing Patta No. 2658, comprised in T.S. No.27, R.S. No.112/6, Cad No.168/40/40/1pt., 168/40/40/2pt, situated within the Municipal limit of ward – G, Block No. 19, Pondicherry Municipal Corporation as it is unfit for human habitation.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Veeramani

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.A.Tamil Vannan Additional Government Pleader

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondent to exercise the power conferred under section 336 of the Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973 by acting on the petitioner's representation dated 25.10.2022, after notice to all parties concerned and holding enquiry in accordance with law to demolish the old and dilapidated building measuring an extent of 2410 Sq.ft with 100 years old tiled house building thereon having built up area of 1200 sq.ft at Old Door No.9 and New Door No.37, Calvey Bungalow Street, Veerargava mudaliyar Thottam,

¶18

Page 2 of 5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶21

Puthupalayam Revenue, bearing Patta No. 2658, comprised in T.S. No.27,

¶22

R.S. No.112/6, Cad No.168/40/40/1pt., 168/40/40/2pt, situated within the Municipal limit of ward – G, Block No. 19, Pondicherry Municipal Corporation as it is unfit for human habitation.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the building belonging to the petitioner is in dilapidated condition and constructed 100 years back. The occupants of the building are refusing to vacate and further fixing responsibility of the petitioner in the event of damage or otherwise. Thus, the petitioner has given a complaint to the respondents to conduct inspection and initiate appropriate action to demolish the building, which is in dilapidated condition by invoking Section 336 of the Puducherry Municipality Act. Since no action has been taken, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition.

¶24

Mr.A.Tamil Vannan, Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent takes notice.

¶25

Page 3 of 5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶28

Considering the facts and circumstance, the respondent is directed to conduct an inspection of the building and initiate all appropriate actions by following the procedures as contemplated under law.

¶29

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

¶30

costs.

¶31

03.04.2023

¶32

Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes

¶33

To The Commissioner Municipality of Puducherry Bussy Street Near Old Bus Stand Kamban Kalaiarangam, Puducherry – 605 001.

¶34

Page 4 of 5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶37

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶38

Jeni

¶39

W.P.No.10327 of 2023

¶40

03.04.2023

¶41

Page 5 of 5

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ponnammal v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ponnammal v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Jeevarathinam Vs Union Territory of Puducherry

Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen & Vs the Secretary to Government

K.Marimuthu, Vs the Secretary to Government

M.Selvabanumathi Vs The Commissioner

M.Parasakthi Vs The District Collector/The Inspector of Panchayats

P.Gajendiran Vs The Commissioner