Full Bench judgment referenced regarding constitution of a permanent committee. The court was informed that permanent committees exist, finding the petition's purpose served and disposing of the writ.
No order as to costs; petition disposed of with purpose served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
P.Pugalenthi
.. Petitioner Vs.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 State of Tamil Nadu to implement the judgment of the Full Bench of the Hon'ble Court in Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission v R.Manikandan: 2011 (5) CTC 1 and to constitute respondent no.2 Committee as a permanent Committee enabling respondent no.2 Committee to function on all working days of the Government of Tamil Nadu.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
For the Petitioner : Mr.M.Radhakrishnan
For the Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jegannath Government Advocate
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.K.Karthik Jegannath, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
stands served.
order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 17.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
kpl
To
_________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
(kpl)
W.P.No.10030 of 2018
17.10.2023
_________ Page 4 of 4_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance regarding the constitution of a permanent committee is stated to be served.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission v R.ManikandanReferred¶14
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission v R.Manikandan: 2011 (5) CTC 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Pugalenthi
State of Tamil Nadu
State Level Scrutiny Committee
SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
