Allowed

The Management of v. the Presiding Officer

Madras HC25 Jan 2023WMP/27445/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court modified its earlier order in a writ petition regarding a deposited amount. Noting that the petitioner company changed its name to Ador Welding Limited, the court allowed the petition and granted liberty to the company to apply to the Labour Court for withdrawal of the deposit.

What did the court decide?

Modified the earlier order to reflect the name change and granted liberty to M/s. Ador Welding Limited to apply to the Labour Court for withdrawal of the deposited amount.

The Management of Vs the Presiding Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.M.P.No.27445 of 2022 in

¶2

W.M.P.No.27445 of 2022 in W.P.No.17169 of 2013

¶3

W.P.No.17169 of 2013

¶4

M.S.RAMESH,J.

¶5

The present miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking for modification of the earlier order of this Court dated 28.02.2022. According to the petitioner, pending the writ petition, the name of the petitioner Company was changed from 'Advani Oerlikon Limited' to 'Ador Welding Limited'.

¶6

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by inadvertence, this was not brought to the notice of this Court.

¶7

Accepting the affidavit filed in support of the present petition,

¶8

the earlier order of this Court dated 28.02.2022 shall be modified by insertion of the following paragraph.

¶9

" 4. (a) It is now brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner Company name was changed from 'Advani Oerlikon Limited' to 'Ador Welding Limited'. Accordingly, M/s.Ador Welding Limited will be entitled to seek for withdrawal of the deposited amount before the Labour Court."

¶10

1/2

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

W.M.P.No.27445 of 2022 in W.P.No.17169 of 2013

¶13

M.S.RAMESH,J.

¶14

Likewise, paragraph 5 of the said order shall stand modified as

¶15

follows:-

¶16

" 5. In the light of the above observation, this Writ Petition stands allowed and the impugned order dated 24.11.2012 is hereby quashed. M/s.Ador Welding Limited is at liberty to make an appropriate application before the concerned Labour Court seeking for withdrawal of the deposited amount and the Labour Court shall endeavor to pass appropriate orders, permitting M/s.Ador Welding Limited to withdraw the deposited amount, preferably within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

¶17

All other observations made in my earlier order dated

¶18

28.02.2022 shall remain intact.

¶19

25.01.2023

¶20

hvk

¶21

Note: Registry is directed to issue the amended copy to those concerned.

¶22

W.M.P.No.27445 of 2022 in

¶23

W.P.No.17169 of 2013

¶24

2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Management of v. the Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Management of v. the Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Anna Mary, Vs The Director of School Education

G.Jayauddin, Vs Tamilnadu Generation and

A.Sounthar Vs The Commissioner of Municipal

R.Joseph Sarguna Singh Vs The Additional Chief

C.Chandraseelan, Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

B.R.Babu, S/o.Ramanna, Vs Pondicherry University