Disposed

The Director v. R.Mannivannan

Madras HC8 Aug 2023WA(MD)/1132/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Director, Emergency Management and Research Institute, appealed a 2015 writ order directing respondents to consider a representation regarding working hours and salary. Noticing that an Industrial Tribunal was already seized of the matter, the appellant sought to close the appeal to await the tribunal's decision. The court accepted this, closed the writ appeal and connected miscellaneous petit

What did the court decide?

The Writ Appeal and connected miscellaneous petition were closed with no costs awarded, allowing the issue to proceed in the Industrial Tribunal.

The Director Vs R.Mannivannan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 08.08.2023

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶5

W.A.(MD)No.1132 of 2015

¶6

and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

¶7

The Director, Emergency Management and Research Institute, Health Visitors Training Institute, Gandhi Hospital for Women and Children, Chennai – 600 005.

...Appellant

-Vs.-

1.R.Manivannan

2.The Home Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Secretariat, St.Geoge Fort, Chennai.

¶12

3.The Director, Department of Health and Welfare, 3^rd Floor, DMS, Annex New Building, 259, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

¶13

4.The Regional Officer, District Manager, 108-Ambulance, Balarengapuram G.H.Campus, Madurai. ...Respondents

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

PRAYER:- Writ Appeal - filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to

¶17

PRAYER:- Writ Appeal - filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 26.06.2015 made in W.P.(MD)No.10592 of 2015 on the file of this Court.

¶18

For Appellant	:Mr.M.Jerin Mathew
For R1	:No Appearance
For R2 to R4	:Mr.M.Sidharthan
	Additional Government Pleader

¶19

¶20

JUDGMENT

¶21

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

¶22

Heard Mr.M.Jerin Mathew, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr.M.Sidharthan, learned Additional Government Pleader for R2 to R4. Service is complete on R1, who is the Writ Petitioner and his name is printed in the cause list. However, there is no appearance by him or on his behalf.

¶23

2.The Writ Petitioner has sought a Mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation to reduce working time and increase salary. The Writ Petition had been disposed on 26.06.2015 directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to consider and pass orders on his representation within a time period fixed.

¶24

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

3.The present appeal has been filed by the Director, Emergency Management and Research Institute, which runs 108 Ambulance service. They state that the representation had, in fact, been disposed, as directed by the Writ Court. More importantly, the Industrial Tribunal is seized of the matter in I.D.No.26 of 2015, where the appellant is a party. In such circumstances, he does not pursue the present Writ Appeal and would prefer to await the decision of the Industrial Tribunal.

¶26

4.Recording this, this Writ Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

[A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,] NCC :Yes/No 08.08.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No

¶28

cmr

¶29

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

¶31

1.The Home Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Secretariat, St.Geoge Fort, Chennai.

¶32

2.The Director, Department of Health and Welfare, 3^rd Floor, DMS, Annex New Building, 259, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

¶33

3.The Regional Officer, District Manager, 108-Ambulance, Balarengapuram G.H.Campus, Madurai.

¶34

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶36

cmr

¶37

W.A.(MD)No.1132 of 2015

¶38

08.08.2023

¶39

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Director v. R.Mannivannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director v. R.Mannivannan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Sudha Vs N. Balasubramani

The Director of School Education, Vs C.Senthilkumar, Physical Educational Teacher

K.Nagarajan Vs M.Jeeva

M. Malaiyarasan Vs the Principal Secretary to

Maria Arputham, Vs the Special Officer/Secretary

The Coronation Arts Crafts Vs the State of Tamil Nadu