Dismissed

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution v. S.P. Senthil Nathan

Madras HC9 Aug 2023WA/970/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ appeal as infructuous since the contesting respondent died. Orders were passed closing related proceedings, and the appellant was directed to disburse benefits to legal heirs within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

The travel of the appeal was dismissed as infructuous. The appellant TANGEDCO to disburse benefits to legal heirs within eight weeks.

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.A.No.970 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 09.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.A.No.970 of 2020 and

¶7

C.M.P.No.11804 of 2020

¶8

1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited [TANGEDCO],

¶9

[Formerly Tamil Nadu Electricity Board], Rep. by its Chairman Cum Managing Director, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶10

2.The Secretary,

¶11

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited [TANGEDCO], [Formerly Tamil Nadu Electricity Board], No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶12

3.The Superintending Engineer, Thiruvannamalai Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited [TANGEDCO],

¶13

[Formerly Tamil Nadu Electricity Board], Vengikkal, Thiruvannamalai – 606 604

¶14

... Appellants

¶15

¶16

S.P.Senthil Nathan .. Respondent

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No.1/4

¶19

W.A.No.970 of 2020

¶20

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set

¶21

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set

¶22

aside the order dated 19.02.2020 made in W.P.No.3972 of 2020.

¶23

For Appellants : Mr.K.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Rajasekar

¶24

JUDGMENT

¶25

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR,J.)

¶26

It is brought to our notice by the learned counsel appearing for

¶27

both sides that the contesting respondent Mr.S.P.Senthil Nathan is no more, therefore, the proceedings already initiated against him become abated and to that extent, orders have been passed by the Tahsildar o n 23.03.2021. When that being so, nothing would survive according to the learned counsel appearing for both sides in this appeal to persuade further.

¶28

2.Recording the same, this writ appeal is dismissed as having

¶29

become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Page No.2/4

¶32

W.A.No.970 of 2020

¶33

3.In view of the dismissal of this appeal since there has been no

¶34

further impediment to disburse the retirement benefits or family pension benefits payable to the legal heirs of the deceased employee, that can be paid and the needful shall be undertaken by the appellant TANGEDCO within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶35

(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.) 09.08.2023 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No cse

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

Page No.3/4

¶38

W.A.No.970 of 2020

¶39

R.SURESH KUMAR., J. and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.

¶40

cse

¶41

W.A.No.970 of 2020

¶42

09.08.2023

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

Page No.4/4

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution v. S.P. Senthil Nathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution v. S.P. Senthil Nathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Palani Vs the Home Secretary

S.Prabhu Vs The Arcot Lutheran church

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and

The Arcot Lutheran Chruch Vs G.Mageshwari and 4 others

The Oriental Insurance Company Vs P.Arun Gandhi

The Director of Town Panchayats Vs T.Thangaraj (Deceased)