Dismissed

The Government of Tamilnadu v. a.Lokose

Madras HC2 Aug 2023WA/514/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismissed a batch of Writ Appeals filed by the Government of Tamil Nadu. The Division Bench upheld the earlier order that granted regularisation and permanent posts to petitioners appointed on daily wages, following a consistent line of judicial rulings.

What did the court decide?

All writ appeals are dismissed without costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

The Government of Tamilnadu Vs a.Lokose — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.08.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.A.Nos.514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520 and 521 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 and 2,2,2,2,2,2 and 2 of 2014

¶7

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by the Secretary to the Government Rural Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶8

2.The Director of Rural Development Panagal Buildings, Saidapet Chennai-15.

¶9

... Appellants in all W.As

¶10

-Vs-

¶11

1.A.Lukose .... R1 in W.A.514 of 2014 N.Durai Singh .... R1 in W.A.515 of 2014 D.Justinraj .... R1 in W.A.516 of 2014 T.Paulraj .... R1 in W.A.517 of 2014 G.Jeyasingh .... R1 in W.A.518 of 2014 P.Justinraj .... R1 in W.A.519 of 2014 S.Wilson .... R1 in W.A.520 of 2014 G.George .... R1 in W.A.521 of 2014

¶12

2.The President Devicode Panchayat Melpuram Panchayat Union Kanniyakumari District.

¶13

The President Vilavancode Panchayat Melpuram Panchayat Union Kanniyakumari District.

¶14

R2 in W.A.No.514 of 2014

¶15

.... R2 in W.A.No.515 of 2014

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/8

¶18

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶19

The President Melpuram Panchayat
Melpuram Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.516 of 2014
The President
Manjalamoodu Panchayat
Melpuram Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.517 of 2014
The President
Puliyur Salai Panchayat
Melpuram Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.518 of 2014
The President
Muzhucode Panchayat
Melpuram Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.519 of 2014
The President
Nattallam Panchayat
Killiyur Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.520 of 2014
The President
Nattallam Panchayat
Killiyur Panchayat Union
Kanniyakumari District.	....	R2 in W.A.No.520 of 2014

¶20

Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P.Nos.40558 to 40561 of 2005 and W.P.Nos.151 to 154 of 2006 dated 26.11.2009.

¶21

In all W.As. For Appellants : Mr.R.Kumaravel, Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajendran, for R1 in WA Nos.514 to 517/2014 and W.A.Nos.519 to 521/2014 R1 Died in W.A.No.518/2014, Mr.K.Arunbabu for R2 in W.A.Nos.515 to 521/2014 No appearance-for R2 in W.A.No.514/2014

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/8

¶24

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶25

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T

¶26

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)

¶27

Since the issue raised in these appeals arise out the common order passed by the Writ Court dated 26.11.2009, all these appeals were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.

¶28

The respondents herein filed the said writ petitions in W.P.No.40558 of 2005 etc., batch before the writ Court seeking for a prayer of Mandamus to absorb the petitioners in a regular establishment in a permanent post with effect from the date of their appointment and to grant all consequential benefits.

¶29

With similar prayers, in fact another set of writ petitions were filed in W.P.Nos.41207 of 2005 etc., batch in the matter of T.Selvamony and others -VsGovernment of Tamil Nadu and Others and that batch of writ petitions were heard by the learned Judge, who allowed those writ petitions by a detailed order dated 25.11.2009.

¶30

When that being so, the present batch of writ petitions ie., W.P.Nos.40558

¶31

of 2005 etc., batch in the matter of A.Lukose -vs- The Government of Tamil

¶32

Nadu and Others came up before the very same learned Judge on the next day ie., 26.11.2009.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/8

¶35

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶36

Since the earlier batch of writ petitions on the similar issue were heard and allowed by the learned Judge on the previous day ie., 25.11.2009, this batch of writ petitions were allowed, following the earlier order and the impugned order reads

¶37

thus,

¶38

" The petitioners in W.P.Nos.40558, 40559, 40560 and 40561 of 2005 and W.P.Nos.151, 152, 153 and 154 of 2006 seek a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to absorb them in the regular establishment in a permanent post with effect from the date of their appointment, namely, 29.1.1993, 29.5.1982, 29.5.1982, 29.1.1991, 12.03.1997, 11.11.1987, 10.4.1984 and 20.2.1995 respectively and grant all consequential benefits to them.

¶39

Considering the order passed by this Court dated 25.11.2009 in W.P.Nos.41207, 41208, 41209 and 41210 of 2005 (T.Selvamony and Others -vs- Government of Tamil Nadu and Others) as regards the regularisation of the services of the petitioner who were paid daily wages at the market fixed by the Collector, these writ petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected W.P.M.P.Nos.34 and 125 of 2007 are closed."

¶40

As against the order passed by the learned Judge dated 25.11.2009 in

¶41

T.Selvamony and Others -vs- Government of Tamil Nadu and Others cited supra, the State preferred a batch of writ appeals in W.A.Nos.1013 of 2012 etc., batch in the matter of Government of Tamil Nadu and Others -vsT.Selvamony and Others and this batch of writ appeals was decided by a Division Bench of this Court by a common judgment dated 11.08.2016, where the Division

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/8

¶44

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶45

Bench has passed the following order:

¶46

" 11. Considering the decision rendered in W.A.(MD) No.147 of 2013, and also considering the fact that the first respondent/petitioners have been appointed as full time Water Supply Assistants on daily wages basis and also working in the same capacity, the order passed by the learned Single Judge is perfectly correct and the same does not call for any interference, and therefore, these Writ Appeals are liable to be dismissed.

¶47

In fine, these Writ Appeals are dismissed without cost. The Common Order dated 25.11.2009 passed in Writ Petition Nos.41207 to 41210 of 2005 by the learned Single Judge of this Court is confirmed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed."

¶48

Like that, as against the orders passed by the learned Judge on 26.11.2009 in A.Lukose -vs- The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others ie., the order impugned, present set of writ appeals have been filed by the Government of Tamil Nadu.

¶49

Since the order dated 25.11.2009 in W.P.Nos.41207, 41208, 41209 and 41210 of 2005 (T.Selvamony and Others -vs- Government of Tamil Nadu and Others) has been followed in the present impugned order and the set of appeals filed in W.A.Nos.1013 of 2012 etc., batch as cited supra since were dismissed, by thus confirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 25.11.2009 and

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/8

¶52

W.A.No.514 to 521 of 2014

¶53

the said order has been followed in the present impugned order dated 26.11.2009,

¶54

the same fate has to be faced by the present appeals also.

¶55