The single judge withdrew the appellants' writ appeal upon counsel's motion and dismissed it as withdrawn, also dismissing the connected miscellaneous petition.
Dismissal of the writ appeal as withdrawn and dismissal of the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.No.3581 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.09.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.3581 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.22990 of 2019
... Appellants
-Vs-
Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P.No.10106 of 2009 dated 12.02.2010.
1/4
W.A.No.3581 of 2019
For Appellants
: Mr.A.Balsing Ramanujam
For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar
Special Government Pleader
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks to withdraw the writ appeal and he
has made an endorsement in the court bundle.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
(R.S.K.,J..) (K.B.,J.) 25.09.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST
2/4
W.A.No.3581 of 2019
To
3/4
W.A.No.3581 of 2019
R.SURESH KUMAR, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
KST
W.A.No. 3581 of 2019
25.09.2023
4/4
S. Venkatesan
D. Sudharsan
T. Kamalakannan
G. Chidambaranathan
K. Sadasivam
The Tamil Nadu State
R. SURESH KUMAR
K. KUMARESH BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
