the online counselling process. So far as the prayer sought for in the first writ petition is concerned, the writ Court, taking note of the counter affidavit filed by the Medical Council of India that the whole process of admission in the medical colleges for the academic year 2016-17 was already over, though found that the 20% quota reservation for the Wards of Insured Persons of ESIC is unconstitutional and illegal, thought it fit not to disturb the admission and declined to grant any relief to the first respondent/writ petitioner. So far as the prayer sought for in the second writ petition is concerned, the writ Court, declaring the reservation policy of Employees State Insurance Corporation providing 20% seats to Wards of Insured Persons of ESIC as unconstitutional and illegal, directed the ESIC not to provide any reservation for the Wards of Insured Persons of ESIC while admitting students in the medical colleges of ESIC. However, the writ Court did not disturb the admission granted to the wards of employees registered under ESIC till the date of the impugned order, as the first respondent/writ petitioner did not implead the candidates who have been admitted for the academic year 2017-18 pursuant to the counselling conducted for the Wards of Insured Persons of ESIC. Challenging the said
