Allowed

Vanitha v. a. Latchumanan

Madras HC12 Dec 2023TR CMP(MD)/200/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to withdraw a case from the Sub Court, Bavani, and transfer it to the Sub Court, Karur. The transfer was granted based on the petitioner's residence and health issues, relieving her of travel difficulties.

What did the court decide?

The case H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2023 was withdrawn from Sub Court, Bavani, and transferred to Sub Court, Karur; records sent within 15 days.

Vanitha Vs a. Latchumanan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.200 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Tr.C.M.P (MD).No.200 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4347 of 2023

¶7

Vanitha : Petitioner/Respondent Vs. A.Latchumanan : Respondent/Petitioner

¶8

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 r/w 151 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2023 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Bavani and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Karur.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthik For Respondent : Mr.P.Muthukumarasamy

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders

¶12

to withdraw and transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2023 on the file of the

¶13

Sub Court, Bavani to the Family Court, Karur.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.200 of 2023

¶16

It is seen from the records that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 26.06.2010 and they were blessed with two children.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working in Transport Corporation at Coimabatore, but she is residing in Karur along with her female child and that the respondent is running a medical shop in Erode.

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent is taking care of his son, who is mentally retarded child, whereas, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the daughter of the parties is also suffering from fits and seizure.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is very difficult to travel from Karur to Bavani to attend the Court as she is taking care of her ill-health daughter.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the residence of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to allow the petition.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶22

Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.200 of 2023

¶23

6.Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. The case in H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2023 on the file of the Sub Court, Bavani, is hereby withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Karur. The learned Subordinate Judge, Bavani, is directed to send the records relating the case in H.M.O.P.No.7 of 2023 to the Sub Court, Karur, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur, is directed to take the same on file and proceed in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

12.12.2023

¶25

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No das To

¶26

1.The Subordinate Judge, Bavani.

¶27

2.The Subordinate Judge, Karur.

¶28

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶30

Tr.C.M.P(MD).No.200 of 2023

¶31

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.

¶32

DAS

¶33

Order made in Tr.C.M.P (MD).No.200 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4347 of 2023

¶34

12.12.2023

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Vanitha v. a. Latchumanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vanitha v. a. Latchumanan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Vellaichamy(Died) Vs M.Murugan

Ponnar Vs Nadukattaiyan Alias Periyasamy

R.Prabakaran Vs The Executive Officer

Durairaj, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Divisional Manager, Vs Shanmugaraja

B.Rajendran, Vs Saleem