Allowed

D.Sindhu v. a.Suresh

Madras HC9 Sept 2023TR CMP/186/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a national Lok Adalat, the Tamil Nadu High Court, presided over by Justice Sunder Mohan, entered into a compromise between parties to transfer divorce proceedings filed in a Sub Court at Poonamallee to the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, for joint trial with restitution of conjugal rights proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.561 of 2021 transferred to III Additional Family Court, Chennai for joint trial.

D.Sindhu Vs a.Suresh — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 09^th day of September, 2023 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶2

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶3

Presided over by

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN AND

¶5

Members

¶6

Mr.G.Dharmaraj, District Judge (Retd.) Mr.C.K.Chandrasekkar, Advocate

¶7

Tr.C.M.P.No.186 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.4197 of 2023

¶8

(Seeking withdrawal of H.M.O.P.No.561 of 2021 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee and transfer the same to the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed)

¶9

D.Sindhu ... Petitioner W/o.A.Suresh

¶10

Vs.

¶11

A.Suresh ... Respondent S/o.Azhagesan

¶12

This case came up for compromise before the National Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.S.Aishwarya and the learned counsel for the respondent Mr.M.Karthik are present. After hearing both the parties, this Court passed the following order :

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Both the parties and their respective counsel are present.

¶15

2.The petitioner seeks transfer of the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.561 of 2021 filed by the respondent/husband for divorce, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.467 of 2022 filed by the petitioner/wife for restitution of conjugal rights.

¶16

3.The parties have now agreed for the transfer of the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.561 of 2021 from the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee to the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.467 of 2022.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

SUNDER MOHAN.,J.

¶19

ssa/gya

¶20

4.Accordingly, the proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.561 of 2021 from the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee, is transferred to the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.467 of 2022 and the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

D.Sindhu Counsel for the Petitioner

¶22

Vs.

¶23

A.Suresh Counsel for the Respondent

Judge

Member Member

The parties/Advocate concerned

¶28

Copy to

¶29

1.The Sub Court, Poonamallee

¶30

2.The III Additional Family Court, Chennai

¶31

3.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶32

4.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶33

5.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies

¶34

Tr.C.M.P.No.186 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.4197 of 2023

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

¶37

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Tr.C.M.P.No.186 of 2023

¶38

09.09.2023

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Sindhu v. a.Suresh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sindhu v. a.Suresh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Senthilkumar Vs P.Dom

Dhanam (Mother of the Deceased) Vs Union of India Owning Southern Railways

Jeeva Vs Dean Jones

Amudha Vs S.Satheeswaran

Praveen Kumar Vs Balakrishnan

Padmanabhan Vs Balakrishnan