Allowed

A.Mercy Jesintha Devi v. M.Charles

Madras HC16 Nov 2023TR CMP/178/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras transferred a domestic proceedings case from the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore to the Family Court, Tirunelveli upon the petitioner's prayer, as she resides in Tirunelveli and facing distance hindered her participation in hearings. Costs were not awarded.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of I.D.O.P.No.59 of 2020 from Principal Family Court, Coimbatore to Family Court, Tirunelveli. Records to be sent within two weeks. Notice to respondent to be issued by the receiving court.

A.Mercy Jesintha Devi Vs M.Charles — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.No.178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3977 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 16.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.No. 178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No. 3977 of 2023

¶7

A. Mercy Jesintha Devi

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

M. Charles ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., praying to withdraw I.D.O.P.No.59 of 2020 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and transfer the same to the Family Court at Tirunelveli.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. J. Stalin For Respondent : No Appearance

¶13

1/5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Tr.C.M.P.No.178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3977 of 2023

¶17

The petitioner / wife seeks transfer of I.D.O.P.No.59 of 2020 pending on the file of Principal Family Court, Coimbatore to the Family Court, Tirunelveli. The petitioner / wife seeks transfer of the proceedings before the Family Court, Tirunelveli on the ground that she is living at Tirunelveli along with her parents and she is not able to attend the Court hearings by travelling 740 kms.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the marriage between the respondent and the petitioner was solemnized on 27.08.2017 at St.Lady of Fathima Church at Gandhipuram, Coimbatore, as per Christian Rights and Customs. Furthermore, she is living along with her parents and it is difficult to attend the Court at Coimbatore. Hence, prays to transfer the IDOP.No.59 of 2020, to the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶19

2/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Tr.C.M.P.No.178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3977 of 2023

¶22

Though notice served to the lower Court counsel, there is no

¶23

representation for the respondent.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances and the reason assigned by

¶25

the petitioner is justifiable, this Court is inclined to transfer the I.D.O.P.No.59 of 2020 to the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶26

In view of the above, I.D.O.P.No.59 of 2020 is withdrawn from the file of the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and transferred to the file of Family Court, Tirunelveli to be disposed of in accordance with law and the Principal Family Court, Coimbatore is directed to send entire records to the Family Court, Tirunelveli, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶28

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

3/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Tr.C.M.P.No.178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3977 of 2023

¶32

However, the Family Court, Tirunelveli is directed to issue notice

¶33

to the respondent and then proceed with the matter as early as possible, from the date of this order.

¶34

16.11.2023

¶35

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No AT

¶36

¶37

The Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶38

The Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/5

¶41

Tr.C.M.P.No.178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.3977 of 2023

¶42

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶43

¶44

Tr.C.M.P.No. 178 of 2023 and C.M.P.No. 3977 of 2023

¶45

16.11.2023

¶46

5/5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Mercy Jesintha Devi v. M.Charles

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Mercy Jesintha Devi v. M.Charles

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Uma Vs M.Logeswari

V.Indhirani Vs a.Rajammal

Shanmugham Vs Ayyasamy

K.Ganesamoorthy Vs S.Murugan

Vanitha Ramani Vs T.Mahendran

Ramasamy Vs Pappathi