Suit for grant of Letters of Administration posted due to plaintiff's default in appearance and non-deposition of evidence following report of settlement.
Suit dismissed for default. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T.O.S.No.21 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
T.O.S.No.21 of 2017
M.R.Ganesan ... Plaintiff Vs M.R.Pachaiappan ... Defendant
Prayer: Plaint filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 for grant of Letters of Administration. Against this petition, a Caveat and supporting affidavit was field on 20.03.2017 by the Caveator above named. As per order of Court, dated 13.07.2017 in O.P.No.638 of 2016 the Original Petition is directed to be converted into Testamentary Original Suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.P.Amarnath
For Defendant : Mr.R.Sivakumar
JUDGMENT
The matter is caused to be listed before this Court in view of the
endorsement made by the learned Additional Master IV, dated 20.03.2023 which is extracted hereunder:
1/3
T.O.S.No.21 of 2017
“The counsel for defendant is present. No representation for the plaintiff. Hence call the matter in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session also the witness on the side of plaintiff is not present and no representation for the plaintiff. Today the case stands posted for plaintiff side evidence. At 04.30 P.M. also no representation for the plaintiff. Hence Post Before the Court.”
09.06.2023
Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non speaking order vum
2/3
T.O.S.No.21 of 2017
R.N.MANJULA,J.
vum
T.O.S.No.21 of 2017
09.06.2023
3/3
R.N.Manjula
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court