M.K.Agrotech Pvt.Ltd., v. K.Suma
Case brief
What is this about?
(T)OP(TM)/17/2023 (ORA/20/2011/TM/CHN)…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(TM)A/71/2023 (T)OP(TM)/17/2023 (ORA/20/2011/TM/CHN)
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
On 19.06.2023, the petitioner placed on record the affidavit of service. The track consignment report annexed thereto indicates that notice could not be served on the second respondent because there is no such person at the address. Upon being directed to do so, the petitioner tried to identify the current address but reported that the current address could not be located. This application for substituted service on the second respondent has been filed in the said facts and circumstances. Therefore, the application is liable to be and is, hereby, allowed by permitting the petitioner to effect substituted service on the second respondent by publishing the notice in one issue of the English daily, DECCAN HERALD, and one issue of the Kannada daily PRAJAVANI, specifying the next date of hearing as 15.12.2023. In addition, the petitioner is directed to affix the notice on the Court notice board.
- List the matter on 15.12.2023.
17.11.2023
rna
1/2
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant substituted service of notice on the second respondent by publication in newspapers and affixation on the court noticeboard due to inability to serve at the registered address.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
- respondent
Second Respondent
Coram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court