M.Iqbal v. C.K.Ragavan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge of the Madurai Bench dismissed an application to recall an order closing Contempt Petition No. 120 of 2021, holding that such relief cannot be granted within contempt jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
None. Sub Application closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sub.A.(MD)No.236 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.12.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
SUB.A.(MD)No.236 of 2023 in CONT.P.(MD)No.120 of 2021
M.Iqbal
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Thiru.C.K.Ragavan, The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Karaikudi.
2.Tmt.Bama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee's Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, praying this Court to recall the order dated 16.02.2023 closing Cont.P.(MD)No.120 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.27313 of 2019 and re-open the same on file.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking recall of an order closing the proceedings can be reopened in contempt jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Iqbal
- respondent
Thiru. C.K. Ragavan
- respondent
Tmt. Bama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court