V.S.Jayabal v. Rangarajan Narasimhan
Case brief
What is this about?
IN Cont.P.No.1499 of 2019 R.MAHADEVAN, J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sub.A.No.628 of 2023 IN Cont.P.No.1499 of 2019
R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
(Order of the Court was made by P.D.Audikesavalu, J.)
Since the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner have already been recorded in the order passed today in the contempt petition, there is no need for impleading the petitioner as a party respondent in the contempt petition.
Accordingly, this sub application stands closed.
gya
Coram
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court