Dismissed

C.Kandaswamy (Died) v. E.Ramachandran

Madras HC27 Mar 2023SA(MD)/75/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004 as withdrawn upon the appellant counsel's letter and submission requesting withdrawal, with no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

C.Kandaswamy (Died) Vs E.Ramachandran — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 27.03.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2007

¶7

1.C.Kandaswamy (Died)

2.K.S.Gayathri

3.K.Saravana Selvan

4.K.Karthiga

5.K.Kasthuri

6.K.Gauthami

... Appellants

(Appellants 2 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole appellant vide Order of this Court dated 25.03.2022 in CMP(MD)No. 2194, 2196 & 2199 of 2022)

/Vs./

1.E.Ramachandran

2.T.Kanagaraj

3.Paul Pandian

... Respondents

(3^rd Respondent is impleaded vide Court Order dated 26.04.2022 in M.P. (MD)No.1 of 2011)

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

1/4

¶23

S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004

¶24

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.46 of 2003 on the file of the District Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil, dated 03.02.2004 in modifying the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.74 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil, dated 18.03.2003.

¶25

For Appellants : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents : No appearance (R1 & R2)

¶26

JUDGMENT

¶27

This matter is listed under the caption 'For withdrawal' today. The learned Counsel for the appellants has addressed a letter dated 17.03.2023 to the Registry requesting to post this matter for withdrawal. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants is also present and he also seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal.

¶28

2. Recording the said letter as well as the submission made by the

¶29

learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the Second Appeal is

¶30

2/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004

¶33

dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶35

27.03.2023

¶36

Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm

¶37

TO:

¶38

1.Th e District Judge, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

¶39

2.The II Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil.

¶40

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶41

3/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004

¶44

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶45

¶46

Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.75 of 2004

¶47

Dated: 27.03.2023

¶48

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Kandaswamy (Died) v. E.Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Kandaswamy (Died) v. E.Ramachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Muthuraj, Vs Narayanan alias Ramesh

Kumara Kannan Vs Jaya

Smt.L.Ramalakshmi Vs Mr.K.R.Subbiah

L.Unnamalai, Vs Sm.Deivanai

Murugan, Vs Selvakumar

Thangasamy Vs the India Cement Company Limited