Alphonse v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellants despite opportunities for hearing and adjournment. No order as to costs was passed.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD) No.517 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.(MD) No.517 of 2011
1.Alphonse 2.Arockiyaraj 3.Sebastian ... Appellants/Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs
Murugesan ... Respondent/Respondent/ Defendant
Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 11.02.2011 made in A.S.No.101 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2007 made in O.S.No.532 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Munsif's Court, Dindigul.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar
_________Page 1 of 4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alphonse 2.Arockiyaraj 3.Sebastian
- respondent
Murugesan
Coram
S.Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court