Kunjammal v. Saroja
Case brief
What is this about?
A special second appeal under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as the appellants sought and were granted permission to withdraw the appeal, resulting in the closure of connected miscellaneous petitions.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the second appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.513 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.(MD)No.513 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.5727 & 5730 of 2020
1.Kunjammal
2.Kasthuri 3.Karthy
Saroja
... Appellants /Vs./ ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2019 dated 18.03.2020 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC), Kumbakonam, reversing the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.152 of 2015 dated 11.04.2018 on the file of the Sub Court, Kumbakonam.
For Appellants : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.S.Jayachandran
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kunjammal, Kasthuri, Karthy, Saroja
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
Abdul Quddrose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court