M.G.Kannan, v. v. Palaniammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution, as the appellant failed to appear or show interest in prosecuting despite repeated listings.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD).No.482 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.(MD).No.482 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD).No.6158 of 2022
M.G.Kannan ... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs. V.Palaniammal ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.2 of 2017 on the file of Sub Court, Virudhunagar dated 24.02.2020 confirming the Judgment and decree made in O.S.No.19 of 2014 dated 02.07.2016 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar, allow the above Second appeal.
For Appellant : No appearance
1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or show interest in prosecuting.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.G. Kannan
- respondent
V. Palaniammal
Coram
Abdul Qudhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court