Dismissed

Rajammal (Died), Pitchaimuthu v. the Executive Officer

Madras HC10 Apr 2023SA(MD)/188/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court listed for dismissal. The court recalled that it had earlier dismissed the appeal based on Section 14 of the TN Land Encroachment Act. As the appellants did not appear or submit any representation, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Rajammal (Died), Pitchaimuthu Vs the Executive… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4088 of 2023

1.Pitchaimuthu

2.Vasudevan

... Appellants

/Vs./

The Executive Officer, Selection Grade Panchayat, Kallidaikurichi, Tirunelveli District.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.44 of 2017, on the file of the Sub Court, Ambasamudram, dated 29.11.2022 by confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.59 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram, dated 27.07.2017.

¶14

For Appellants : No appearance

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

This matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ today. There

¶20

is no representation on the side of the appellants once again.

¶21

2. This matter is listed before me for the third time. On 30.03.2023, after having observed by this Court based on a prima facie consideration that this Second Appeal cannot be admitted in view of Section 14 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, which provides for a specific bar of jurisdiction of civil Courts with regard to any proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, this matter was adjourned to 05.04.2023.

¶22

3. When the matter was listed on 05.04.2023, the learned counsel

¶23

appearing for the appellants sought further time to produce the authorities. On his request, this matter was adjourned to 10.04.2023, ie., today, but however, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal'.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023

¶27

4. As directed by this Court, this matter is listed under the caption

¶28

'For Dismissal' today. However, there is no representation on the side of

¶29

the appellants. It can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶30

10.04.2023

¶31

Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm

¶32

TO:

¶33

1.Th e Sub Court, Ambasamudram.

¶34

2.The District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram.

¶35

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023

¶39

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶40

¶41

Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.188 of 2023

¶42

Dated: 10.04.2023

¶43

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rajammal (Died), Pitchaimuthu v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajammal (Died), Pitchaimuthu v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayirathammal Vs Krishnammal

Pappa Vs Padmanabhan

Chellappa, Vs Muthukrishnan

Seethalakshmi Vs Manikam

Ayyadurai, Vs Sivasankaran

P.Rasu Vs Arul