Dismissed
Samiappan v. the Executive Officer
Madras HCSA/995/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Third and Fourth Appeals dismissed as withdrawn and First and Second Appeals dismissed as abated. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed as withdrawn or abated; connected CM closed; no costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.No.995 of 2009
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 25.04.2023
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
¶6
S.A.No.995 of 2009 and
¶7
C.M.P.No.14404 of 2016
¶8
1.Samiappan (Deceased)
¶9
2.P.Chinnathambi Kandar
¶10
3.K.V.Chellandi
¶11
4.K.S.Natesan
¶12
5.Mariappa Kandar
¶13
- 6.Selvaraj
¶14
… Appellants
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
P.Chinnathambi Kandar
- appellant
K.S.Natesan
- appellant
Selvaraj
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Prasanna Venkatramana Swamy Kovil, Pandamangalam, Namakkal Taluk
- respondent
K.Arumugham
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court