Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC. Counsel for appellant sought withdrawal. High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and closed the connected civil miscellaneous petition.
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.629 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 02.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.629 of 2017 &
C.M.P.No.15578 of 2017
Senthilvelan
...Appellant
Vs.
1.Ganesan
2.Vijaya
3.Manokari ...Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree of District Court, Nagapattinam, dated 28.09.2012 made in A.S.No.10 of 2012 confirming the Judgement and Decree of Additional Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai dated 11.11.2011 made in O.S.No.10 of 2009.
1/3
S.A.No.629 of 2017
For Appellant : Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent 1 : Died : For Respondents No Appearance 2 & 3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking
to withdraw the above Second Appeal. The said memo is taken on file and the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
02.01.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan To 1.The District Court, Nagapattinam.
2.The Additional Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai.
P.T. ASHA, J,
2/3
S.A.No.629 of 2017
kan
S.A.No.629 of 2017
02.01.2023
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Senthilvelan
Ganesan
Vijaya
Manokari
P.T. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
