Dismissed
Damodran v. a.M.Abdul Salam(Died)
Madras HCSA/1664/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
5.Senthurvalli ... Appellants 1 to 5/Respondents/ Plaintiffs 2 to 6
11.Bala Sundari ... Appellants 6 to 11
[Appellants 6 to 11 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased 4th appellant vide order dated 08.07.2011 made in M.P.(MD) Nos.2 and 3 of 2010 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
_________Page 1 of 6
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
15.Jeyasankari
16.Jeyasankar
17.Thiraviyakani
18.Ambiga
19.Anburaj
... Appellants 12 to 19
[Appellants 12 to 19 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased 3rd appellant vide order dated 06.11.2019 made in C.M.P.(MD) No.6853 of 2019 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
20.Ramalingam
21.R.Murugan
22.R.Saravana Selvi
23.Saradha
24.Kavitha
... Appellants 20 to 24
[Appellants 20 to 24 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd appellant vide order dated 06.11.2019 made in C.M.P.(MD) No.5759 of 2019 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
Vs
1.A.M.Abdul Salam (Died) ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/ Plaintiff
2.Sabur Fathima
3.Thamin Ansari
4.Sajitha Parveen
5.Thahira Irfan
_________Page 2 of 6
6.Abdul Kader
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
... Respondents 2 to 6
[RR2 to 6 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order dated 06.11.2019 in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
[RR2, 4 and 5 – amended vide order dated 16.02.2021 made in C.M.P.(MD) No.1552 of 2021 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
7.A.Murugan (Died) ... 7th Respondent
[R7 was impleaded as a party respondent vide order dated 18.10.2019 made in C.M.P.(MD) No.6844 of 2019 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
8.M.Petchiammal
9.M.Jeyapaul 10.M.Kumar 11.M.Anand ... Respondents 8 to 11
[RR8 to 11 were brought on record as LRs of the deceased 7th respondent vide order dated 08.01.2021 made in C.M.P.(MD) No.6016 of 2020 in S.A.No.1664 of 2000]
Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 09.06.2000 made in A.S.No.15 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Court, Tuticorin reversing the judgment and decree dated 11.07.1996 made in O.S.No.143 of 1996 on the file of the Principal District Munsif's Court, Tuticorin.
_________Page 3 of 6
For Appellants : Mr.M.P.Senthil For RR2 to 6 : Ms.Jessi Jeeva Priya RR1 & 7 : Died For RR8 to 11 : No appearance J U D G M E N T
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
The learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating that the 1st appellant, Damodaran on behalf of the other appellants had instructed
him to withdraw the second appeal by letter dated 10.01.2023. The letter sent by the party is enclosed with the memo. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the second appeal.
costs.
24.01.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes
abr
_________Page 4 of 6
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
To
Page 5 of 6
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
abr
S.A.No.1664 of 2000
24.01.2023
_________Page 6 of 6
Damodaran
A.M. Abdul Salam
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court