Dismissed
1. Subramani(died) v. 1. Murugan
Madras HCSA/154/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed for default due to the absence of the appellants and their counsel on the day of hearing.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 03.02.2023
¶4
CORAM :
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
¶6
S.A.No.154 of 2001
¶7
- Subramani (died)
¶8
- Kumaresan
¶9
- Ellamal
¶10
- Dhanalakshmi
¶11
- Poonambalakamaraj
¶12
- Parameswari ...Appellants [A3 to A6 brought on record as LRs of the deceased A1 vide Court order dated 21.09.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.463 to 468 of 2012, 554/2012 in S.A.No.154 of 2007 [KRJ]
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Subramani (died) and others
- respondent
Murugan and others
Coram
AI extract
P.T. Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court