Singaram v. Mottaiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal for default, the appellant failed to appear on the prescribed days. The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the appeal for default without hearing.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
S.A.No.126 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.04.2023
CORAM
MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A.No.126 of 2023
1.Singaram 2.Sekar
... Appellants
Vs.
1.Mottaiyan 2.Manonmani
... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2021 passed in Appeal Suit number 32 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge, Ulundurpet, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.202 of 2014 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Ulundurpet on 12.03.2019.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Singaram
- appellant
Sekar
- respondent
Mottaiyan
- respondent
Manonmani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court