Ravichandra v. Jayaraman
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal was dismissed as abated because the learned counsel represented that both appellants were deceased and a connected appeal had earlier been dismissed for abatement.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.1128 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.01.2023
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.1128 of 2003
- Ravichandran 2. S.Ganeshan [2nd respondent is transposed as 2nd appellant vide order dated 12.08.2004 made in C.M.P.No.16500 of 2003] .. Appellants
-Vs.Jayaraman .. Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.150 of 2003 dated 07.04.2003 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, confirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court in O.S.No.507 of 1999 dated 03.05.2002.
For appellant ... Ms.V.J.Latha For Respondent ... Mr.N.Suresh
1/3
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ravichandran
- appellant
S. Ganeshan
- respondent
Jayaraman
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court