Disposed

E.T.B.Sivapriyan v. Nagapriya

Madras HC1 Mar 2023REV.APPL/57/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review Application filed to review a dismissed Civil Revision Petition concerning visitation rights and to direct the District Court to dispose of a pending interlocutory application on visitation rights. The Court directed the District Court to dispose of the petitions early and disposed of the Review Application.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Court, Chengalput, to dispose of the pending interlocutory application and petitions as early as possible.

E.T.B.Sivapriyan Vs Nagapriya — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.03.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

Review Application No.57 of 2023

E.T.B.Sivapriyan

..Petitioner

Vs.

Nagapriya ..Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of C.P.C., praying to review the order dated 22.12.2022 in C.R.P.No.4209 of 2022 and consequently give an appropriate direction for speedy disposal of I.A.No.2 of 2021 in G.W.O.P.No.75 of 2019, pending on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalput.

¶12

For Petitioner : Ms.K.Thulasi

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The Review Application has been filed to review the order dated 22.12.2022 in C.R.P.No.4209 of 2022 and to give an appropriate direction for speedy disposal of I.A.No.2 of 2021 in G.W.O.P.No.75 of 2019, pending on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalput.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶16

Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶17

The review petitioner filed the Civil Revision Petition in

¶18

C.R.P.No.4209 of 2022 for a direction to dispose of the Interlocutory Application filed in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in G.W.O.P.No.75 of 2019, pending on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalput.

¶19

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner mainly contended

¶20

that the revision petitioner has not seen his son for the past about four years and thus, he filed the Civil Revision Petition for speedy disposal of the Interlocutory Application, seeking Visitation Right.

¶21

This Court, considering the large number of pendency of cases before the District Court concerned, made an observation that the cases are to be disposed of within a reasonable period of time. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition would cause prejudice to the petitionerfor the purpose of urging the District Court concerned for early disposal of the case.

¶22

Taking note of the facts and circumstances, the District Court,

¶23

Chengalput, shall dispose of the petitions as early as possible.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/4

¶26

Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶27

With these observations, the Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶28

stands disposed of. No costs.

¶29

01.03.2023

¶30

Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes kak

¶31

¶32

The District Court, Chengalput.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶36

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶37

kak

¶38

Review Application No.57 of 2023

¶39

01.03.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

E.T.B.Sivapriyan v. Nagapriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.T.B.Sivapriyan v. Nagapriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muniappan Vs the district collector

T.Soundarapandian Vs S.Sureshkumar

S.Ravichandran Vs S.Chitra

Mrs. Prema Vs Mrs.Krishnaveni

J.Manivannan Vs N.Sugumar

The Special Tahsildar (La) Vs P. Jayaraman (Died)