Allowed

Saravanan.P v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Sept 2023REV.APLW(MD)/164/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed a review application under Order XLVII Rules 1-2 read with Section 114 CPC. The court found errors apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 08.02.2023 which disposed of W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021.

What did the court decide?

Review allowed; impugned order dated 08.02.2023 set aside; W.P.(MD)No.17883 of 2021 restored to file.

Saravanan.P Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

REV APLW(MD).No.164 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 05.09.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

REV.APLW(MD)No.164 of 2023 in

¶7

W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021

¶8

P.Saravanan ... Petitioner/

¶9

Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The State represented by The Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat,

¶12

Chennai.

¶13

2.The Commissioner of School Education, O/o the Commissioner of School Education, D.P.I.Complex,

¶14

Chennai.

¶15

3.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o the Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur,

¶16

Thanjavur District.

¶17

4.The District Educational Officer, O/o the District Educational Officer, Thanjavur,

¶18

Thanjavur District.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

REV APLW(MD).No.164 of 2023

¶22

5.The Secretary, Oriental Higher Secondary School, West Main Street, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents/ Respondents

¶23

PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 08.02.2023 in W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed Suhail

¶25

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4

¶26

ORDER

¶27

After hearing the learned counsel on either side, I am more than

¶28

satisfied that the order dated 08.02.2023 disposing of W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021 suffers from errors apparent on the face of record. No specific

¶29

direction as such has been given. Therefore, the order is set aside.

¶30

This Review Application is allowed. W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021

¶31

is restored to file.

¶32

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

REV APLW(MD).No.164 of 2023

¶34

Registry is directed to place paper before the Hon'ble Judge

¶35

holding the roster. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36

05.09.2023

¶37

Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC :Yes/No MGA

¶38

¶39

1.The Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat,

¶40

Chennai.

¶41

2.The Commissioner of School Education, O/o the Commissioner of School Education, D.P.I.Complex, Chennai.

¶42

3.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o the Chief Educational Officer, Thanjavur,

¶43

Thanjavur District.

¶44

4.The District Educational Officer, O/o the District Educational Officer, Thanjavur,

¶45

Thanjavur District.

¶46

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

REV APLW(MD).No.164 of 2023

¶48

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶49

MGA

¶50

REV.APLW(MD)No.164 of 2023 in W.P(MD)No.17883 of 2021

¶51

05.09.2023

¶52

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Saravanan.P v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saravanan.P v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Tuticorin Salt & Marine Vs the Union of India

M. Ramesh, Vs Radhakrishnan

M/S.Mountain Spinning Mills Vs the Superintending Engineer

Sri Vinayaga Hardware and Electricals Vs Pandi alias Karuppasami

S.Rajendran Vs Mrs.I.S.Mercy Ramya I.A.S.

Rajaram K Vs mrs.s.premala