Allowed

Krishnakumar, v. Kasthuri, W/O. Chellaiya

Madras HC2 Jun 2023REV.APLC(MD)/23/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application (MD No.23 of 2014) allowed against an order dismissing a civil miscellaneous appeal without assigning reasons. Court held the deficiency attracted error apparent on the face of the record under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Appeal restored to file for final hearing. Gupta J.

What did the court decide?

Review application allowed; impugned order quashed; Civil Miscellaneous Appeal restored to file for final hearing.

Krishnakumar, Vs Kasthuri, W/O. Chellaiya — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014 in C.M.A(MD)No.295 of 2012

¶7

Krishnakumar ... Petitioner/Appellant

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Kasthuri 2.Rajakili

¶10

3.Selvakumari

¶11

4.Sivaperumal

¶12

5.Rosemary 6.Praseed 7.Kumar 8.Sathi 9.Rasu

¶13

10.United India Insurance Company, Nagercoil Branch, ACC Complex, Veppamoodu Junction, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents/ Respondents

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014

¶17

Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w. Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, to review the judgment and decree passed by this Court in C.M.A(MD)No.295 of 2012, dated 03.04.2013 and allow the present review application.

¶18

For Petitioner : M/s.J.Anandhavalli For R1-R9 : No Appearance For R10 : Mr.I.Robert Chandrakumar

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The present review application has been filed seeking to review

¶21

the order of this Court, dated 03.04.2013 made in C.M.A(MD)No.295 of 2012.

¶22

After extracting the arguments on either side, this Court without assigning any reason whatsoever, has dismissed the appeal in paragraph no.7 of the order. Reason is the soul of an order. When there are no reason, it clearly falls within the purview of error apparent on the face of the record. This Court finds that all the ingredients under Order 47 Rule

¶23

1 are satisfied.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/4

¶26

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014

¶27

Hence, this Review Application stands allowed and the Civil

¶28

Miscellaneous Appeal is restored to file.

¶29

02.06.2023

¶30

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶31

gbg

¶32

Note : Registry is directed to list the appeal for final hearing on 13.06.2023.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014

¶36

R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.

¶37

gbg

¶38

Order made in Rev.Aplc(MD)No.23 of 2014

¶39

Dated: 02.06.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Krishnakumar, v. Kasthuri, W/O. Chellaiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnakumar, v. Kasthuri, W/O. Chellaiya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Dharmalingam, Vs Mrs. T.Sooria Parba

Mohamed Noohu Vs Juli Premkumar Asirvatham

The Deputy Director (Ins.Ii) Vs M/S.Viswabharathi Textiles (P)Ltd.

The Branch Manager Vs Ponnalagu

Raja Vs Suriliammal(Died)

P.Alwarappan, Vs the Secretary