Allowed

Patiala Distillers and Manufactures Ltd. v. Empee Distilleries Ltd.

Madras HC21 Sept 2023(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras allowed a rectification petition filed by M/s. Patiala Distillers & Manufacturers Ltd. seeking cancellation of the registration of the trade mark 'COMMANDO' by M/s. Empee Distilleries Ltd., noting that both parties are in identical businesses with nearly identical marks.

What did the court decide?

Directed cancellation of Trade Mark No. 1117954 (COMMANDO) and removal of the entry from the Register of Trade Marks within four weeks.

Patiala Distillers and Manufactures Ltd. Vs Empee… — Intellectual Property | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.09.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023 (ORA/176/2014/TM/CHN)

¶7

M/s.Patiala Distillers & Manufacturers Ltd., Village Main, Patiala-147 001 (Punjab) ... Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

M/s.Empee Distilleries Ltd., , No.59, Harris Road, Pudupet, Chennai - 600 002.

¶10

2.The Registrar of Trade Marks, Intellectual Property Office Building, G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Transfer Original Petitions (Trade Marks) filed under Sections 47, 57, 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to remove / cancel / expunged / rectify the entry pertaining to impugned Trade Mark "COMMANDO" registered under No.1117954 in class 33 and stay the effect and operation of the entry pertaining to impugned

¶12

1/5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

¶15

Trade Mark "COMMANDO" registered under No.1117954 in class 33

¶16

during the pendency of the present proceedings.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.Somnath De for M/s.K.G.Bansal and Co., For Respondent 1 : Mr.Ramkumar Natarajan for M/s.Jacob Kurian

¶18

For Respondent 2 : S.Janarthanam, SPC

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner seeks rectification of the entry pertaining to the

¶22

trade mark "COMMANDO'' registered as Trade Mark No.1117954 in class 33. By asserting that the petitioner adopted the trade marks COMMANDO and COMMANDO XXX RUM in the year 1977 and has been using the said marks honestly, openly and continuously since then and that the petitioner is, therefore, aggrieved by the adoption and use of the trade mark COMMANDO by the first respondent herein, the present petition was filed.

¶23

2/5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

¶26

On instructions, learned counsel for the first respondent

¶27

states that the said respondent is not interested in protecting the impugned mark any longer.

¶28

On examining the evidence on record, it is clear that both parties are engaged in identical businesses and the marks are nearly identical. Since the marks are nearly identical and such marks are applied to goods which are also nearly identical, the petitioner has made out a case for rectification of the register.

¶29

Consequently, this petition is allowed with the following

¶30

directions:

¶31

(i) The Registrar of Trade Marks is directed to cancel the

¶32

certificate of registration relating to Trade Mark No.1117954 in class

¶33

33 and remove the entry relating thereto from the Register of Trade

¶34

Marks.

¶35

3/5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

¶38

(ii) The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶39

(iii) There shall be no order as to costs.

¶40

21.09.2023

¶41

rna/gvn Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶42

4/5

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023

¶45

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

¶46

rna/gvn

¶47

(T)OP(TM)/143/2023 (ORA/176/2014/TM/CHN)

¶48

21.09.2023

¶49

5/5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Patiala Distillers and Manufactures Ltd. v. Empee Distilleries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patiala Distillers and Manufactures Ltd. v. Empee Distilleries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maxworth Orchards Ltd. Vs v.Madusudhan Rao

Sri Guggila Krishna Vs M/s.Sri Krishna Jewellers

Sri Guggila Krishna Vs Sri Krishna Jewellers

The Ryzman Family Partnership Vs The Registrar of Trade Marks

Ganesh Grains Limited Vs K.R.Nagendra and K.N.Shoba trading as Shankar Industries

United Foods Public Company Limited Vs The Registrar of Trade Marks