Allowed

G.Kannan v. Radha Gopalan

Madras HC12 Dec 2023OP/180/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants Letters of Administration to the petitioner, the son of the deceased's sister and a legatee under her Will. The court found the Will duly executed and attested. The petitioner was directed to execute a security bond and render annual accounts.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted in favour of the petitioner. Directed to execute a security bond of Rs.25,000/- and render true and correct accounts once in a year.

G.Kannan Vs Radha Gopalan — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶2

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶3

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶4

This Original Petition has been filed under Sections 232 and 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Order XXV Rule 5 of Original Side Rules, for the grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the Last Will and Testament of the deceased S.Thara.

¶5

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶6

3.The petitioner is the son of the respondent, who is the sister of

¶7

the deceased S.Thara. The deceased S.Thara is a Spinster. She died on 15.11.2018. The deceased S.Thara executed a Will dated 13.09.2018. It is the case of the petitioner that the deceased / testatrix bequeathed her property in favour of the petitioner. There are no other legal heirs to the deceased. Hence, the petitioner, being the legatee under the Will, seeks Letters of Administration in his favour.

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶10

4.On the side of the petitioner, the petitioner has examined

¶11

himself as P.W.1 and Exs-P.1 to P.4 were marked.

¶12

5.P.W.1 in his evidence had narrated the averments made in the

¶13

Original Petition stating that the petitioner has filed this Original Petition for the grant of Letters of Administration in his favour in respect of the Last Will executed by the deceased Ms.S.Thara. Ex-P.1 is the original Will dated 13.09.2018 executed by the deceased; Ex-P.2 is the death certificate of the deceased; Ex-P.3 is filed to prove the assets left by the deceased; Ex-P.4 is the

¶14

affidavit of assets showing the net value of estate as Rs.10,42,000/-.

¶15

6.Mrs.V.Aneetha Kumar, one of the attesting witnesses of the Will has been examined as P.W.2. She has stated about the execution as well as the attestation of the Will by the said Ms.S.Thara while she was in sound state of mind in the presence of one Mrs.Vasuki. At the request of the testatrix, P.W.2 signed as first attestor to the Will. Ex-P.5 is the affidavit filed by P.W.2 in this regard. The evidence of attesting witness not only prove the execution but also attestation of the Will and there is no other materials to

¶16

suspect the Will.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶19

7.In view of the above facts, I am of the view that the petitioner

¶20

has proved the execution and attestation of the Will. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for the issuance of Letters of Administration in his favour.

¶21

8 . Accordingly, this Original Petition is ordered. Issue Letters of Administration in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to duly administer the properties and credits of the deceased more fully described in the schedule. The petitioner is also directed to execute a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) in favour of the Assistant Registrar (O.S.II), High Court, Madras. The petitioner is further directed to render true and correct accounts once in a year.

¶22

12.12.2023

¶23

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶26

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶27

¶28

O.P.NO.180 OF 2023

¶29

12.12.2023

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Kannan v. Radha Gopalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Kannan v. Radha Gopalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I.Ramaraaj Vs R.Chandra Gupta and 2 others

S.Sarayana Vs Boolieni Developers Limited and another

R.Rehman Vs Gajalatha and Another

Narayani Sivaprakasapillai and 2 Others Vs No Respondent

Arun Thambuswamy, Vs M/S Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

P.Dhanalakshmi and 2 Others Vs No Respondent