C.Murugan Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
In I.P.No.6 of 2018, the petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel despite prior directions and reposting. The Court concluded the petitioner was no longer interested and annulled the previous order, closing the Insolvency Petition for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Previous order annulled; Insolvency Petition closed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
I.P.No.6 of 2018
C.SARAVANAN, J.
I.P.No.6 of 2018
The petitioner who has filed this petition has not appeared either in person or through the counsel either before this Court or before the learned Master. The case was listed before this Court and was directed to be reposted before the learned Master, again on 23.11.2023. On that day, also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
- Considering the same, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with the remedy in this proceedings. Therefore, order dated 15.03.2018 is annulled. Consequently, this Insolvency Petition is closed for non-prosecution.
01.12.2023
jas
1/2
I.P.No.6 of 2018
C.SARAVANAN, J.
Coram
C.Saravanan, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court