Court closed a suit for permanent injunction regarding the film 'JITHAN 2' after recording that the plaintiff had already released the movie subsequent to filing the suit, rendering nothing for further adjudication.
Suit closed with no costs as the subject matter (movie) was already released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S.No.685 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.10.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.S. No.685 of 2015
P.Srinivas @ Rahul
.. Plaintiff
/versus/
1.Yuvaraj Reddy 2.Vimala Elumalai 3.G.Sathish Kumar
.. Defendants
Prayer: Civil Suit has been filed under Order VII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order IV Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Section 62 of Copyrights Act, 1957 to pass judgment and decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, staff, subordinates, assigns or anybody else acting on their behalf from in anyway interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful production, direction and releasing of the Full Length Tamil Feature Film 'JITHAN 2' either by way of claiming any right or title over the film or in any other manner whatsoever.
For Plaintiff :Ms.Angel Jenifer for M/s.Richardson Wilson
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
1/2
C.S.No.685 of 2015
vga
J U D G M E N T
It is informed by Ms.Angel Jenifer (Enrollment No.5821 of 2023),
learned counsel representing the counsel on record for the plaintiff that the suit can be closed by recording the fact that the plaintiff has released the movie 'JITHAN 2', which is the subject matter of the suit. The plaintiff had sought for the relief of permanent injunction against the defendants not to interfere with the plaintiff’s peaceful production, direction and release of the movie 'JITHAN 2'.
2.Since the movie has already been released by the plaintiff subsequent to the filing of the suit, nothing survives for further adjudication in this suit. After recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff that the movie has already been released by the plaintiff, this suit is closed. No costs.
16.10.2023
vga
C.S. No.685 of 2015
2/2
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Yuvaraj Reddy
Vimala Elumalai
G.Sathish Kumar
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
